Claude training for people who aren't technical, taught hands-on in Singapore and online. There are two ways in. Join the Claude Masterclass as an open cohort, or book a private Claude session built on your team's own documents.
Last updated 30 October 2026
I run WTFox.ai on Claude. Not as a demo, as the thing the company actually operates on, which is the only reason I've got an opinion worth listening to here.
Four pieces do the work, and they stack in an order a beginner can follow. Projects hold your context, so a chat starts warm instead of cold every morning. Connectors reach into Gmail and Drive with deliberately narrow access, Drive read-only and Gmail read and draft. Skills make one task repeatable, written in plain instructions with no code anywhere in the file. And Cowork takes a job end to end while you go and do something else.
Claude or ChatGPT? I'm not going to hand you a benchmark table, and anyone who does is measuring something your team will never notice. Both are good. Claude is where I start a non-technical room, because those four pieces have an order to them and people can see themselves climbing it. ChatGPT is broader and more of your team have already tried it. That's a teaching preference, not a verdict, and I teach both.
You've never opened Claude, or you opened it once, asked it something and closed the tab. No technical background needed. Most of my rooms start right there, and every term gets a plain English explanation the first time it comes up.
Claude Masterclass or 1:1A business that wants Claude used on real work, with someone walking the room while people build. We work on the documents and tasks your team already has open, so Monday morning looks different.
Private Claude training for teamsRun a training business or a community and want a Claude course in your catalogue? Have a look at the partner model, and the Masterclass already runs that way with Cogentic AI Partners.
Pick the model, set the effort, and brief it like a new hire on their first day rather than a search box. We run the same question twice in front of the room, cold then briefed, and the difference does the arguing for me.
Where most people stopA Project holds your instructions, your documents and your tools in one place, so it answers warm. Connectors give it hands, with narrow access and your login. This is the step where people stop starting from zero every morning.
Where it starts payingA skill teaches it once so the task runs the same way every time, and Cowork finishes a job end to end. The habit worth installing is files plus outcome, not steps, then reviewing what comes back the way you'd review a new hire's first draft.
Where the hours come back3 hrs, hands-on the whole way, capped at 30 people and built for a room that is new to AI. It runs with Cogentic AI Partners. Bring a laptop, a Claude account logged in before you arrive, and one real piece of your own work. A seat is S$349.
3 cohorts have run so far, 2 evenings on 20 and 21 Aug 2026 in Singapore and a third on 1 Oct 2026. Students have joined from London, Spain, Singapore, Malaysia and India. In Aug the room worked through 4 builds. A Claude Project around their own work, their tools connected, a first custom skill written, and one real task handed over to Cowork before the night ended.
The numbers, with the caveat attached. 91% of survey respondents rated the pacing just right. Self-rated confidence in setting up a Claude Project rose 48%. Both come from an anonymous survey before and after the Aug cohorts, answered by different people each time, so treat it as post-session feedback rather than a study.
"Geargina has very good 'trainer' skills. She knows the stuff well and is able to articulate the approach very clearly with simple illustrations and drawing comparisons to things we easily understand."
"Yesterday's session was terrific! Geargina was very knowledgeable, and my mind was focused on how the learning could be used in everyday life, not just work."
"Enjoyed the session. I'm gonna build my own Obsidian coming week."
Same ladder, your material. 2 hrs to a full day, in person in Singapore or online, working on the documents and the tasks your team already has open. A 2 hr session gets a room to chat and context. 3 hrs is the format that reaches a skill and a delegated task. A full day gives the build blocks room to breathe.
The run sheet, the three formats side by side, the survey and the honest bit about what went wrong all sit on the workshops hub. Pricing is scoped per team, so ask for team pricing with your group size and format in mind.
I'm going to show you under the hood what that looks like.
The full write-up of the August cohorts is at the Claude Masterclass 101 case study. The concept underneath connectors gets its own explainer on the blog: API vs MCP, explained simply. And if you're still deciding between tools, why "just use ChatGPT" is bad advice.
Whichever one you already pay for. If it's an open choice, I start non-technical rooms on Claude, because Projects, connectors, skills and agentic work stack in an order people can follow without touching code. ChatGPT has the broader ecosystem and more of your team will have tried it already. That's a preference formed from teaching, not a benchmark, and I teach both.
For the Masterclass, yes. The pre-work note asks everyone to arrive with a paid Claude plan, confirmed in the pre-work note, and already logged in, because the agentic block needs one. For a private team session it depends how far up the ladder you want to go, so we confirm plan requirements on the scoping call before anyone's asked to pay for anything.
4 things, in the 3 hr Masterclass format. A Claude Project holding your own documents and instructions. Your tools connected. One custom skill written, and one real task handed over to Cowork end to end. That's what the Aug 2026 cohorts built. Shorter formats stop earlier on the ladder, and the scoping call decides how far we go.
The Claude Masterclass is a 3 hr evening session in Singapore, hands-on the whole way. Private team sessions run anywhere from 2 hrs to a full day, in person in Singapore or online. 2 hrs gets a room through chat and context. 3 hrs reaches a custom skill and a task handed to Cowork. For a full day I'd pick in person, because the build blocks go better when I can look over shoulders.
Up to 30 for an open Masterclass cohort, while private sessions are sized around your team. I've run a full day for a private team of 6 to 7, and a 3 hr session for 40+ senior managers at the BNF Group strategy retreat in March 2026. Bigger rooms need helpers walking the floor while people build, so we sort that out on the scoping call.
No. These Claude workshops aren't SkillsFuture-accredited, so SkillsFuture credits can't be used for them. Private team sessions are invoiced to your company, so they can come out of your own training budget instead.
A seat on the open Claude Masterclass is S$349. Private Claude training for teams is scoped per team, with no rate card, because the number moves with group size, format length, how much prep goes into building on your own documents, and whether it runs in person or online. Send those on the contact form and you get a figure back.
Want a head start before your session? Copy the 5 prompts I use every week, then try 5 prompting techniques that work across Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini. If you're bringing a whole team, read what happened when 40 professionals met Claude for the first time. Not sure which model to pick in the menu? Start with which Claude model to use for which job.